Energy score
Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.
Energy
Stockholm benefits from a low-carbon national grid and a long-running district energy and biofuel transition. Energy in Stockholm scores 92/100, placing it in the leading group of the indexed set.
Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.
92/100
Strong directional transition score across infrastructure and policy.
Advanced
Renewable share and infrastructure investment support resilience.
Mixed
Solar is modest; wind, hydro, and bioenergy carry the transition.
This HTML table mirrors the visible score cards so important comparison data is never trapped in a browser-only chart.
| Metric | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Energy readiness | 92/100 | District energy and electrification are mature. |
| Grid adaptation | Advanced | Northern-Europe planning capacity is a strength. |
| Renewable opportunity | Mixed | Resource mix shapes the local transition path. |
A crawlable comparison across a selection of same-country and top-scoring cities. The complete set is reachable via the rankings, the cities index, and each city profile.
| City | Score | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Stockholm (this page) | 92/100 | Stockholm benefits from a low-carbon national grid and a long-running district energy and biofuel transition. |
| Malmö | 84/100 | Malmö's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Gothenburg | 84/100 | Gothenburg's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Kalmar | 84/100 | Kalmar's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Kristianstad | 84/100 | Kristianstad's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Växjö | 82/100 | Växjö's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Täby | 82/100 | Täby's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Örebro | 80/100 | Örebro's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Norrköping | 80/100 | Norrköping's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Uppsala | 80/100 | Uppsala's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Lund | 80/100 | Lund's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Nyköping | 80/100 | Nyköping's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Trollhättan | 80/100 | Trollhättan's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Västerås | 78/100 | Västerås's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Tumba | 78/100 | Tumba's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Gävle | 77/100 | Gävle's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Halmstad | 76/100 | Halmstad's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Södertälje | 76/100 | Södertälje's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Borås | 74/100 | Borås's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Eskilstuna | 73/100 | Eskilstuna's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Luleå | 72/100 | Luleå's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Östersund | 66/100 | Östersund's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Sundsvall | 65/100 | Sundsvall's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Karlskrona | 62/100 | Karlskrona's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Helsingborg | 50/100 | Helsingborg's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Umeå | 50/100 | Umeå's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Linköping | 50/100 | Linköping's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Jönköping | 50/100 | Jönköping's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Karlstad | 50/100 | Karlstad's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Visby | 50/100 | Visby's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Reykjavik | 95/100 | Reykjavik's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
Energy pages combine resource context, infrastructure maturity, and adaptation capacity rather than headline renewable share alone. Across the indexed cities the energy average is 64/100, so Stockholm is 28 points above the median. Data year 2025; last updated 2026-05-16. Drawn from 3 institutional references.
Read this module with the main open the stockholm city profile and the read the scoring methodology page so single-topic pages do not hide tradeoffs across dimensions.
Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation. Verified datasets are being integrated; official sources should be used for critical decisions.
3 institutional references inform this view, listed below with reliability notes. Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation; verified datasets are being integrated and official sources should be used for critical decisions.
Used as an energy-resource and weather-normalization reference.
Used to explain urban climate vulnerability and adaptation scoring logic.
Used to ground energy-readiness scoring in international transition guidance.
These links connect module pages back to city, ranking, and sibling topic paths with crawlable href values.
Return to the complete Stockholm profile with all module scores and source context.
Affordability, essential costs, and day-to-day financial pressure for residents.
Health-oriented air-quality conditions with context from WHO, EEA, and EPA benchmarks.
Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.
Broadband and mobile connectivity quality, latency, and digital-readiness signals for residents and remote workers.
Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.
A balanced ranking of cities across affordability, air quality, clean-energy readiness, and resilience.
Cities that combine strong services, mobility, safety, clean air, and resilience into a healthy day-to-day profile.