Safety score
Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.
Tokyo scores at the very top globally on safety, with very low violent-crime context, strong institutions, and high resident perception of safety.
Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.
93/100
Top-tier safety profile across most neighborhoods.
Very low
Internationally low violent-crime context informs the score.
Very high
Day-to-day perception of safety is consistently positive.
This HTML table mirrors the visible score cards so important comparison data is never trapped in a browser-only chart.
| Metric | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Safety score | 93/100 | Among the safest large global cities. |
| Violent-crime context | Very low | Stability supports daily life and night-time activity. |
| Resident perception | Very high | Public-space confidence reinforces the score. |
A crawlable comparison across every indexed city makes it easy to scan how this module changes between metros.
| City | Score | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Tokyo (this page) | 93/100 | Tokyo scores at the very top globally on safety, with very low violent-crime context, strong institutions, and high resident perception of safety. |
| Singapore | 95/100 | Singapore is among the safest cities globally, with very low violent-crime context and strong institutional response. |
| Copenhagen | 92/100 | Copenhagen scores high on safety due to strong public trust, low violent-crime context, and reliable institutional response. |
| Sydney | 87/100 | Sydney is among the safer large global cities, with low violent-crime context and strong institutional response. |
| Toronto | 84/100 | Toronto is among the safer large North American cities, with low violent-crime context and solid institutional response. |
| Berlin | 82/100 | Berlin has solid safety with neighborhood variation. Violent-crime context is comparatively low; opportunistic risks concentrate in transit and night-life areas. |
| London | 79/100 | London has solid safety with neighborhood variation. Violent-crime context is comparatively low; opportunistic risks are concentrated in transit and tourist hubs. |
| Paris | 78/100 | Paris has solid overall safety, with neighborhood variation and tourist-area opportunistic risks more visible than violent crime. |
| New York | 74/100 | New York is mid-pack on safety: violent-crime context has improved over decades but property and incident pressure remain present in dense areas. |
Safety scoring recognizes Tokyo's combination of low violent-crime context, strong institutional response, and consistent resident perception across the metro.
Read this module with the main city profile because single-topic pages can miss tradeoffs. A city with a high energy score can still have housing pressure, and a city with strong opportunity can still carry health exposure risk.
These pages use trusted institutional references for methodology and context. Mock values are typed and ready to be replaced by API-backed city datasets without changing route structure.
Used as a directional benchmark for relative city safety framing.
Used as a policy and methodology reference for urban exposure and resilience signals.
These links connect module pages back to city, ranking, and sibling topic paths with crawlable href values.
Return to the complete Tokyo profile with all module scores and source context.
Affordability, essential costs, and day-to-day financial pressure for residents.
Health-oriented air-quality conditions with context from WHO, EEA, and EPA benchmarks.
Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.
Broadband and mobile connectivity quality, latency, and digital-readiness signals for residents and remote workers.
Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.
A balanced ranking of cities across affordability, air quality, clean-energy readiness, and resilience.
Cities that combine strong services, mobility, safety, clean air, and resilience into a healthy day-to-day profile.