Energy score
Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.
Energy
Wellington benefits from New Zealand's low-carbon electricity baseline with hydropower and geothermal providing most generation. Energy in Wellington scores 88/100, placing it in the strong group of the indexed set.
Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.
88/100
Strong directional transition score.
Strong
Renewable integration supports planning continuity.
Hydro and geothermal
Diverse low-carbon resources carry the system.
This HTML table mirrors the visible score cards so important comparison data is never trapped in a browser-only chart.
| Metric | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Energy readiness | 88/100 | Low-carbon mix supports the trajectory. |
| Grid adaptation | Strong | Hydropower is the central resource. |
| Renewable opportunity | Hydro and geothermal | Resource mix shapes the local transition path. |
A crawlable comparison across a selection of same-country and top-scoring cities. The complete set is reachable via the rankings, the cities index, and each city profile.
| City | Score | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Wellington (this page) | 88/100 | Wellington benefits from New Zealand's low-carbon electricity baseline with hydropower and geothermal providing most generation. |
| Auckland | 86/100 | Auckland operates with a low-carbon electricity baseline led by hydropower and geothermal generation, with active building-efficiency work. |
| Lower Hutt | 72/100 | Lower Hutt's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Christchurch | 72/100 | Christchurch's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Tauranga | 72/100 | Tauranga's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Queenstown | 72/100 | Queenstown's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Napier | 72/100 | Napier's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Invercargill | 70/100 | Invercargill's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Dunedin | 70/100 | Dunedin's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Hibiscus Coast | 65/100 | Hibiscus Coast's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Porirua | 65/100 | Porirua's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Hastings | 65/100 | Hastings's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Whanganui | 65/100 | Whanganui's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Upper Hutt | 63/100 | Upper Hutt's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Blenheim | 60/100 | Blenheim's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Paraparaumu | 59/100 | Paraparaumu's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Gisborne | 58/100 | Gisborne's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Palmerston North | 50/100 | Palmerston North's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Nelson | 50/100 | Nelson's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Rotorua | 50/100 | Rotorua's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| New Plymouth | 50/100 | New Plymouth's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Whangārei | 50/100 | Whangārei's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Hamilton | 50/100 | Hamilton's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Reykjavik | 95/100 | Reykjavik's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Oslo | 95/100 | Oslo benefits from a near-fully-renewable national grid led by hydropower, supporting deep electrification of mobility and buildings. |
| Copenhagen | 94/100 | Copenhagen has a mature energy-transition profile, with district energy experience and strong climate-adaptation planning. |
| Zurich | 92/100 | Zurich operates with a low-carbon electricity baseline, strong building-efficiency standards, and continuous district-energy investment. |
| Stockholm | 92/100 | Stockholm benefits from a low-carbon national grid and a long-running district energy and biofuel transition. |
| Vancouver | 90/100 | Vancouver operates with a low-carbon electricity baseline led by hydropower, with active building and transport electrification work. |
| Seattle | 90/100 | Seattle operates with a low-carbon electricity baseline led by hydropower, with active building and transport electrification work. |
| Amsterdam | 89/100 | Amsterdam has a clear clean-energy direction with district heat, offshore wind context, and active building-efficiency policy. |
Energy scoring weighs resource context, infrastructure maturity, and adaptation capacity. Across the indexed cities the energy average is 64/100, so Wellington is 24 points above the median. Data year 2025; last updated 2026-05-16. Drawn from 3 institutional references.
Read this module with the main open the wellington city profile and the read the scoring methodology page so single-topic pages do not hide tradeoffs across dimensions.
Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation. Verified datasets are being integrated; official sources should be used for critical decisions.
3 institutional references inform this view, listed below with reliability notes. Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation; verified datasets are being integrated and official sources should be used for critical decisions.
Used as an energy-resource and weather-normalization reference.
Used to explain urban climate vulnerability and adaptation scoring logic.
Used to ground energy-readiness scoring in international transition guidance.
These links connect module pages back to city, ranking, and sibling topic paths with crawlable href values.
Return to the complete Wellington profile with all module scores and source context.
Affordability, essential costs, and day-to-day financial pressure for residents.
Health-oriented air-quality conditions with context from WHO, EEA, and EPA benchmarks.
Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.
Broadband and mobile connectivity quality, latency, and digital-readiness signals for residents and remote workers.
Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.
A balanced ranking of cities across affordability, air quality, clean-energy readiness, and resilience.
Cities that combine strong services, mobility, safety, clean air, and resilience into a healthy day-to-day profile.