GCIGlobal City Intelligence
Cost of Living

Cost of Living in Singapore

Singapore is expensive on rent and vehicles, balanced by strong transit, public services, and food-court price stability.

Last updated
2026-05-03
Data year
2025
Module score
60/100

Cost of Living score

Affordability, essential costs, and day-to-day financial pressure for residents.

Cost of Living in Singapore60/100

Affordability score

60/100

Mid-tier affordability with strong public-service offsets.

Housing pressure

High

Public housing programs improve access; private rents remain high.

Vehicle cost

Very high

Vehicle entitlement costs structurally limit private-car ownership.

Singapore cost of living data table

This HTML table mirrors the visible score cards so important comparison data is never trapped in a browser-only chart.

Singapore Cost of Living data table
MetricValueContext
Affordability score60/100Public transport and food-courts moderate daily expense.
Housing pressureHighMost residents access HDB housing at managed prices.
Vehicle costVery highTransit and ride-hail offset most household needs.

Cost of Living city comparison

A crawlable comparison across every indexed city makes it easy to scan how this module changes between metros.

Cost of Living city comparison table
CityScoreSummary
Singapore (this page)60/100Singapore is expensive on rent and vehicles, balanced by strong transit, public services, and food-court price stability.
Berlin70/100Berlin is more affordable than most major European capitals, with rent pressure rising over time.
Tokyo68/100Tokyo is not cheap, but transit access, service density, and varied housing formats improve practical affordability.
Copenhagen66/100Copenhagen is expensive in rent and services, but strong public infrastructure reduces some hidden mobility and health costs.
Paris55/100Paris has high housing pressure, but compact mobility and public amenities reduce some day-to-day costs.
Toronto55/100Toronto offers strong public services but housing prices and rents drive elevated cost pressure.
London52/100London is expensive in housing and central services, partially offset by transit reach and broad opportunity access.
Sydney50/100Sydney is expensive on housing and central services, partially offset by outdoor amenity and service quality.
New York49/100New York offers exceptional access to work and services, but housing costs place heavy pressure on household resilience.

Explanation

Cost-of-living scoring weighs visible rent and services against transit and food-court offsets. Singapore performs well on offsets despite high housing pressure.

Read this module with the main city profile because single-topic pages can miss tradeoffs. A city with a high energy score can still have housing pressure, and a city with strong opportunity can still carry health exposure risk.

Sources

These pages use trusted institutional references for methodology and context. Mock values are typed and ready to be replaced by API-backed city datasets without changing route structure.

Continue exploring

These links connect module pages back to city, ranking, and sibling topic paths with crawlable href values.

Energy in Singapore

Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.

Safety in Singapore

Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.

Internet Speed in Singapore

Broadband and mobile connectivity quality, latency, and digital-readiness signals for residents and remote workers.

Overall Intelligence

A balanced ranking of cities across affordability, air quality, clean-energy readiness, and resilience.

Quality of Life

Cities that combine strong services, mobility, safety, clean air, and resilience into a healthy day-to-day profile.