Global CityIntelligence

Cost of Living

Cost of Living in Osaka

Osaka is more affordable than Tokyo for housing, with services costs similar. Cost of Living in Osaka scores 70/100, placing it in the solid group of the indexed set.

Last updated
2026-05-16
Data year
2025
Module score
70/100

Cost of Living score

Affordability, essential costs, and day-to-day financial pressure for residents.

Cost of Living in Osaka70/100

Affordability score

70/100

Moderate directional score; balanced for a major Japanese metro.

Housing pressure

Moderate

Central rental demand is steady; supply is more flexible.

Transport cost offset

Very strong

Dense rail networks reduce private-vehicle dependence.

Osaka cost of living data table

This HTML table mirrors the visible score cards so important comparison data is never trapped in a browser-only chart.

Osaka Cost of Living data table
MetricValueContext
Affordability score70/100Housing is more accessible than Tokyo peers.
Housing pressureModerateOuter districts are widely accessible.
Transport cost offsetVery strongMulti-modal commuting is standard.

Cost of Living city comparison

A crawlable comparison across a selection of same-country and top-scoring cities. The complete set is reachable via the rankings, the cities index, and each city profile.

Cost of Living city comparison table
CityScoreSummary
Osaka (this page)70/100Osaka is more affordable than Tokyo for housing, with services costs similar.
Fukuoka74/100Fukuoka's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies.
Sapporo74/100Sapporo's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies.
Kyoto72/100Kyoto is more affordable than Tokyo and Osaka for most residents, with seasonal tourism shaping central housing.
Nagoya70/100Nagoya's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies.
Tokyo68/100Tokyo is not cheap, but transit access, service density, and varied housing formats improve practical affordability.
Saint-Quentin82/100Saint-Quentin's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies.
Brăila82/100Brăila's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies.
Pleven82/100Pleven's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies.
Galați82/100Galați's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies.
Hanoi82/100Hanoi is comparatively affordable for housing and services across most districts.
Addis Ababa82/100Addis Ababa is comparatively affordable for housing and services across most districts.
Foggia81/100Foggia's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies.
Wałbrzych81/100Wałbrzych's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies.
Bytom81/100Bytom's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies.
Ruda Śląska81/100Ruda Śląska's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies.
Teruel80/100Teruel's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies.
Balti80/100Balti's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies.
Béthune80/100Béthune's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies.
Bourges80/100Bourges's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies.
Calais80/100Calais's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies.
Boulogne-sur-Mer80/100Boulogne-sur-Mer's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies.
Montbéliard80/100Montbéliard's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies.
Cosenza80/100Cosenza's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies.
Catanzaro80/100Catanzaro's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies.
Dąbrowa Górnicza80/100Dąbrowa Górnicza's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies.
Włocławek80/100Włocławek's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies.
Kalisz80/100Kalisz's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies.
Legnica80/100Legnica's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies.
Halle80/100Halle's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies.
Lens80/100Lens's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies.

Interpretation

Affordability scoring weighs essential spending, mobility, services, and the stability of daily life. Across the indexed cities the cost of living average is 62/100, so Osaka is 8 points above the median. Data year 2025; last updated 2026-05-16. Drawn from 3 institutional references.

Read this module with the main open the osaka city profile and the read the scoring methodology page so single-topic pages do not hide tradeoffs across dimensions.

Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation. Verified datasets are being integrated; official sources should be used for critical decisions.

Sources

3 institutional references inform this view, listed below with reliability notes. Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation; verified datasets are being integrated and official sources should be used for critical decisions.

Continue exploring

These links connect module pages back to city, ranking, and sibling topic paths with crawlable href values.

Osaka city profile

Return to the complete Osaka profile with all module scores and source context.

Air Quality in Osaka

Health-oriented air-quality conditions with context from WHO, EEA, and EPA benchmarks.

Energy in Osaka

Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.

Safety in Osaka

Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.

Internet Speed in Osaka

Broadband and mobile connectivity quality, latency, and digital-readiness signals for residents and remote workers.

Climate Risk in Osaka

Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.

Overall Intelligence

A balanced ranking of cities across affordability, air quality, clean-energy readiness, and resilience.

Quality of Life

Cities that combine strong services, mobility, safety, clean air, and resilience into a healthy day-to-day profile.