Climate Risk score
Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.
Climate Risk in Munich82/100
Climate Risk
Climate Risk in Munich
Munich carries moderate climate risk centered on river flooding and rising summer heat. Climate Risk in Munich scores 82/100, placing it in the strong group of the indexed set.
- Last updated
- 2026-05-16
- Data year
- 2025
- Module score
- 82/100
Primary hazard
Riverine flood
Isar river flooding is the main long-run pressure.
Heat exposure
Rising
Sustained summer heat is becoming a planning priority.
Adaptation capacity
Strong
Planning continuity supports resilience.
Munich climate risk data table
This HTML table mirrors the visible score cards so important comparison data is never trapped in a browser-only chart.
| Metric | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Primary hazard | Riverine flood | Active flood-management work targets this risk. |
| Heat exposure | Rising | Tree canopy and cooling work are growing. |
| Adaptation capacity | Strong | Public-realm investments are key levers. |
Climate Risk city comparison
A crawlable comparison across a selection of same-country and top-scoring cities. The complete set is reachable via the rankings, the cities index, and each city profile.
| City | Score | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Munich (this page) | 82/100 | Munich carries moderate climate risk centered on river flooding and rising summer heat. |
| Giessen | 84/100 | Giessen's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Hagen | 83/100 | Hagen's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Bottrop | 83/100 | Bottrop's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Remscheid | 82/100 | Remscheid's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Hanau | 82/100 | Hanau's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Esslingen am Neckar | 82/100 | Esslingen am Neckar's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Pforzheim | 81/100 | Pforzheim's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Reutlingen | 81/100 | Reutlingen's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Siegen | 81/100 | Siegen's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Witten | 81/100 | Witten's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Oberhausen | 80/100 | Oberhausen's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Moers | 80/100 | Moers's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Ludwigsburg | 80/100 | Ludwigsburg's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Tübingen | 79/100 | Tübingen's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Frankfurt | 78/100 | Frankfurt's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Bergisch Gladbach | 78/100 | Bergisch Gladbach's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Gütersloh | 77/100 | Gütersloh's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Hamburg | 76/100 | Hamburg carries elevated climate risk centered on Elbe and storm-surge flooding, with strong adaptation planning. |
| Stuttgart | 76/100 | Stuttgart's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Recklinghausen | 76/100 | Recklinghausen's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Salzgitter | 76/100 | Salzgitter's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Berlin | 75/100 | Berlin faces moderate climate exposure focused on heat waves, surface-water flooding, and drought-pressure on green infrastructure. |
| Cologne | 74/100 | Cologne's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Düsseldorf | 74/100 | Düsseldorf's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Freiburg | 74/100 | Freiburg's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Münster | 72/100 | Münster's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Wiesbaden | 72/100 | Wiesbaden's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Aachen | 72/100 | Aachen's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Wolfsburg | 72/100 | Wolfsburg's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Leipzig | 72/100 | Leipzig's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
Interpretation
Climate-risk scoring combines hazard exposure with adaptation capacity. Across the indexed cities the climate risk average is 62/100, so Munich is 20 points above the median. Data year 2025; last updated 2026-05-16. Drawn from 3 institutional references.
Read this module with the main open the munich city profile and the read the scoring methodology page so single-topic pages do not hide tradeoffs across dimensions.
Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation. Verified datasets are being integrated; official sources should be used for critical decisions.
Sources
3 institutional references inform this view, listed below with reliability notes. Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation; verified datasets are being integrated and official sources should be used for critical decisions.
- IPCC: AR6 WGII Chapter 6: Cities, settlements and key infrastructure
Used to explain urban climate vulnerability and adaptation scoring logic.
- NASA: NASA POWER
Used as an energy-resource and weather-normalization reference.
- UN-Habitat: World Cities Report 2024
Used as a policy and methodology reference for urban exposure and resilience signals.
Continue exploring
These links connect module pages back to city, ranking, and sibling topic paths with crawlable href values.
Munich city profile
Return to the complete Munich profile with all module scores and source context.
Cost of Living in Munich
Affordability, essential costs, and day-to-day financial pressure for residents.
Air Quality in Munich
Health-oriented air-quality conditions with context from WHO, EEA, and EPA benchmarks.
Energy in Munich
Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.
Safety in Munich
Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.
Internet Speed in Munich
Broadband and mobile connectivity quality, latency, and digital-readiness signals for residents and remote workers.
Overall Intelligence
A balanced ranking of cities across affordability, air quality, clean-energy readiness, and resilience.
Quality of Life
Cities that combine strong services, mobility, safety, clean air, and resilience into a healthy day-to-day profile.